National ID

With much happening in the world with regards to the issue of personal security and personal freedom, I chose to discuss a topic that I am very intrigued by—the idea of a mandatory National ID System. The National ID System is a way to link a multitude of records into one single source, such as a driver’s license, in order to better verify one’s identity. It is interesting to know that Congress has instructed the Department of Transportation to develop a mandated but funded National ID System, known as the REAL ID Act of 2005, with the hopes of adding extra security to its system. The plan it seems is to create a type of National ID System and require the entire nation to enforce it. The use of the word system, instead of card, seems to be implemented in order to avoid heat from pro-liberty groups who may be opposed to such ideas. The reality behind the façade, however, is that if enacted, all 50 states will be required to link their databases or cards together. Isn’t this the same theory as having a National ID Card?

There seems to be two sides to the theory of requiring U.S. citizens to carry a National ID Card. Proponents seem to think that this type of system basically already exists, so why not just enhance it. They believe that the government can and does gain access to personal information through a realm of sources anyway. The creation of a more stringent policy, they believe, will help increase security and deter terrorism. The basic argument for the National ID System is that proponents believe that it will create a more watchful government and in turn better protect its citizens. Opponents against the National ID System believe that where there is a will, there is a way and there may be loopholes to this type of system. They also feel that our government has already met the demands of the nation with regards to increased security and by enforcing this plan it will diminish citizens’ privacy. I think that there are many pros and cons to requiring citizens to adopt this type of system. I tend to ‘sit on the fence’ with this particular argument. While I agree that increasing security and deterring terrorism and crime are bonuses of this proposed system, I also understand how some may perceive this as a stepping stone to the invasion of personal privacy. If our government is successful in implementing the National ID System, what will be next? Could this fuel the fire for some larger course of action?

Commentary on Voter Suppression

Jillian makes a great argument in her discussion of ACORN and voter fraud. This is a very important topic as the act of registering fictitious and even deceased persons has been an ongoing issue. I was very interested in the fact that the Nevada branch of ACORN was raided with accusations that ACORN hired 59 felons to help submit over 300 possible fraudulent voter registration cards. I agree with the idea that states should require some sort of identification in order to show proof of citizenship. This seems like the most logical solution to the problem of voter fraud.

The idea that “people want more, but want to do less” seems to be a recurring philosophy in politics. I completely agree with Jillian’s statement that “voting is an honor and a privilege; with that comes responsibility”. She also makes a very good argument for citizens to remember that voting is an honor and that Americans should grow up and respect that we have the opportunity to do so. As she mentions, there are many countries where only the wealthy are allowed to vote, and as we are all aware, even countries where women aren’t considered citizens. We all need to accept our responsibilities as American citizens and follow through with protecting our rights. We do this by voting, and if that means jumping through some hoops to get the correct documentation that allows us to vote as legal citizens, then so be it. Jillian’s statements make sense and I agree with her.